Please, take into account that is an automatic translation made by a computer; the translation may not be always very accurate. If this translation is not clear enough in your native language, please let us know here: https://encosh.org/contact/. Donations will help paying professional translators for including qualitative translations instead
After having read this initiative I found some issues that could be clarified in order for the text to be clear for all readers, even those less familiar with Patous and the french context, namely: The Patou designation should be briefly explained (ex. local designation for LGDs); which components are included in the triptych used for livestock protection in France, apart from LGDs? Which are the main issues concerning the reluctance to use LGDs in France? Finally, one main problem with this type of studies is to standardize data collection among different observers, and this could be mentioned in Disadvantages; furthermore, it seems GPSs are missing from the Equipment list.
Very original and simple idea! A recent study by Radford and colleagues (2020) concludes that artificial eyespots significantly increases the survival of cattle, and thus "applying artificial marks to high-value livestock may therefore represent a cost-effective tool to reduce livestock predation". Here's the link to the paper: https://rdcu.be/b8EPm
Very interesting initiative. When was it initiated? Do you know the duration of the efficacy of such light system? Do predators eventually get used to the lights and ignore them? Thanks for any further information.